If the child is sufficiently intelligent the child can get a full tuition scholarship. It happens all the time.

 

When did I say that only children from affluent families should go to college? What I have said is that only sufficiently intelligent children should go to college.

 

If you had read my comments with better reading comprehension skills than your written skills indicate you would know that I think genes, not race, are the deciding factor in a person's overall abilities.

Nevertheless, I believe on the basis of all the available and relevant evidence that these genes vary among the races.

 

The only reason race is important in evaluating a person's abilities is because native abilities vary among the races.

 

That would not surprise me. Alcohol is more dangerous than marijuana.

 

Race differences in average IQ are largely genetic

A 60-page review of the scientific evidence, some based on state-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain size, has concluded that race differences in average IQ are largely genetic...

The Worldwide Pattern of IQ Scores. East Asians average higher on IQ tests than Whites, both in the U. S. and in Asia, even though IQ tests were developed for use in the Euro-American culture. Around the world, the average IQ for East Asians centers around 106; for Whites, about 100; and for Blacks about 85 in the U.S. and 70 in sub-Saharan Africa...

Trans-Racial Adoption Studies. Race differences in IQ remain following adoption by White middle class parents. East Asians grow to average higher IQs than Whites while Blacks score lower.
*not_secure_link*www.news-medical.n....aspx#id_d90f8fc5-74e1-46ab-bd03-eafd0730133a

 

This goes out to the fools who have ganged up to flame me in this thread. You seem to think there is safety in numbers. You may get some enjoyment in being part of a mob. Nevertheless, it should be clear to any intelligent and fair minded observer that I outclass all of you combined. Moreover, I am not even trying hard.

Nor am I getting angry.

Actually, this is fun. :excited:

No bragging. Just fact. :neutral:

 

Make up your mind doggo, you ask others to debate you but when they do and ask you questions that obviously make you uncomfortable you then accuse them of flaming you. You're as predictable as night follows day.

As it seems no one agrees with your unscientific argument then of course it's going to look like there's a mob.

You try harder??, I'd like to see you try and accomplish that.

 

So you do think yourself superior then, what a surprise.

genes may indeed vary amonst races BUT this still does NOT prove that intelligence and violent crime go hand-in-hand which is something you have been advocating.

But you have insinuated and implied that Black people DO NOT have the intelligence to become affluent, and therefore cannot send their children to college. Though there are plenty of black people who have grown up in some of the most poorest areas in the states, they have gone to college and gained good educations and then gained high positions in employment.
So explain how this can happen in light of your beliefs.

There is a difference to being attracted to a late teen girl, than showing an attraction to a teenage girl who has quite clearly just entered her teen years.
I should think a lot of heterosexual men would be indifferent to a girl just entering her teenage years, as they would be more receptive to a girl in her late teens.

 

Here are some links for you to read and then understand that your belief of race and intelligence DOES NOT always go hand-in-hand.

Lists of successful BLACK people.

*not_secure_link*www.blackmontreal.com/id791.htm

*not_secure_link*www.aawc.com/paa.html

Take a look at Matthew Gaines.

*not_secure_link*www.victoriaspast.com/Famous_Black_Americans/FamousBlackAmericans.htm

Take a look at Booker T Washington, and George Washington Carver as both these were born into slavery.

This is just a few of the links I have found quickly, that show flaws in your conclusions. Now when are you going to accept this.

 

This is taken from the last page of your link.

You have shown a clear indication that you do not share this thought.

=======================================================

In their article, Rushton and Jensen also address some of the policy issues that stem from their conclusions. Their main recommendation is that people be treated as individuals, not as members of groups. They emphasized that their paper pertains only to average differences. They also called for the need to accurately inform the public about the true nature of individual and group differences, genetics and evolutionary biology.

=======================================================

 

Never said they had low IQ's.
Your thesis is that high IQ will result in more success in life and a lower level of violence. The overall success a race (Jews, orientals, Germans etc.) experiences is in correlation with their intelligence. Higher IQ=lower violence. Blacks, according to you, are less inteligent and that explains their lower success on average and their higher level of violence.

I refute that thesis and point to the brutality of two of your "superior" races during WWII. Their brutality was not in any way justified by military strategy or as a means to win the war. It was not isolated. It was not short term. For a decade two of your master races systematically, as a matter of national policy, brutally massacred innocent, non combatant people. Sadistically butchered them.

Now. Lets review your response to my arguments
1) It was an anomaly
2) I've refuted your argument. I'm tired of doing it.
3) (silence)
4) You aren't being logical
5) When you attack me personally I know I've won the argument
6) The Tuskagee airmen were at best an average military unit
7) (silence)
8) The Germans and Japanese were compelled by economic factors and national humiliation.
9) You are pestering me even after I've refuted your arguments.
10) The Germans were smart; they almost won the war they were so smart.

So tell you what. Start a new thread. Call it DL'S arguments refuting Shooters arguments about the bell curve thingy. Make it a poll. Link to your posts that you believe best refute my argument against your thesis. Do not run away. Do not try to divert the argument to something else. Don't offer new arguments. You post your links and I'll post mine. We'll let the members judge if your arguments are more valid than mine.

You see, I believe I have refuted your thesis, the basic premise of the Bell Curve Thingy, and that "niggers is stupid and violent".

You have consistently refused to engage me in meaningful debate on this topic. I have used logic and facts to refute your thesis. I have not engaged in personal attacks against you. I have not avoided responding to your arguments because I don't have a valid response.

So. Meet me out back of the lunch room after school and we'll settle this once and for all like adults.

Or, you can shut up about racial superiority and stop your racist remarks.

Your choice.

 

so doggo why no IQ number yet?????????????????

and chris i have been known to say the "while i disagree with what you say i will defend your right to say it" deal but it isnt original to me or anyone here

Monsieur l'abbé, I detest what you write, but I would give my life to make it possible for you to continue to write.
Voltaire, letter to M. le Riche, February 6, 1770

and the more common version

I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
Voltaire, (Attributed); originated in "The Friends of Voltaire", published 1906, by S. G. Tallentyre

 

Thought I'd visit to see if NTNC posted any new material for DL and others to wank over. But ALAS we have to be satisfied with the same old (but incredibly stimulating) pictures.

 

True that!

 

Nothing like bumping a 10 year old thread just so you can participate, huh ? Who’s the troll again? Someone’s got his feelings hurt

Not stirring up any shit with this bump

 

If you don’t like DL, just ignore him. I don’t really know him but he’s never been mean to me.

 

Who are you? I have never noticed you before.